How did Christians won supremacy at Nicaea? The secret is: MONEY MONOPOL via USURY ! Get back in the former days. Many christians were gnostics. They knew science + chemistry = alchemy.
Many gnostics (See Stochol Papyrus-X) knew how to falsify silver by coating lead with a silver surface (silver-deposition by wet chemistry, then forging hot). This silvering recipe was used for coating bronze-mirrors, as described by Pliny the Elder, Book 33-36. Most of this knowledge was wiped-out form history as they translated falsely Acts 19:19 > books burning. Yet we have accounts in Pliny's book on silver Fouree and in some gnostic papyrus scrolls.
Matrices 4 forgery have been found in Dacia near the huge silver-mines at Red-Montana. The rest was done near Alexandria Lib., full of science and gnostic chemistry. Basically, gnostic christians gave the forged money to bankers (arginatrii+numularii) and those paid with Fouree the debts by the clients. Is like the replacement of FED gold-guarantee in $$ today. Fiat money occurs, hence, debasse! Sacking Roman Empire!
The roman Denarius was made out of silver. His forged counterpart is called Fouree. Huge quantities of fourees were found in sites. That lead to a debase, inflation. To counter Fouree, the state itself was compelled to "dilute" the silver content of Denarius, in order to have "control" - because bankers retired the silver from circulation.. Pliny the Elder complains clearly about the forged Denarius in his Encyclopedia. Docletian was forced to issue laws against alchemists because they knew howto make "silver and gold". And the ONLY alchemists were the gnostic christians. Part of “christian repression” is related to those alchemists...
The inflation and debase are well documented so the demagogues politics.
Debasement and the decline of Rome
Inflation and the Fall of the Roman Empire
Infographic: Currency and the Collapse of the Roman Empire
Hyperinflation and trust in Ancient Rome
The forged Fouree here: Fourrée - Wikipedia
Until Nicaea Council (the Victory Council) Roman Empire sacked in 3 financial crisis. After the first crisis, he was forced to conquest Dacia (the "dragon country" with dragon flag) and Trajanus considered himself ARGONAUT> stealing the Golden Fleece. That is in Rosia-Montana / Transylvannia. Huge amounts of silver and gold were plundered. From 12 books about Dacia (written by Trajan itself) 11 are "lost". Hiding the real sums, just as in Mexico later. Even today Rosia has huge amounts of gold, but mining is interdicted by the "conspiracy". Deep secrets there...
The plundered silver vanished soon in the "game of usury" made by bankers. (Mat 25:29 + Luke 19:26)! The jewish-christians at top, had the "manual to monopoly" hidden inside Gospels in plain sight. Denarius suffered a debase similar to $$$ in the last 100 years - graphs are similar!
That was coupled with "socialist propaganda" at Rome. Democrats versus Republicans = "Optimates" vs "Populares" (Demagogues). Demagogues won, as they promised "free bread" for roman citizens. See "Cura Annonae". All peasants MIGRATED to Rome forming "lumpen - proletariat"! Bread and circus. Just as today...
Hence the lumpen - proletariat religion of Pater Liber ( Aventine Triad see later Trinity..) and derived pray > "Pater Noster, give us our daily bread..." Once having poor lumpen-proletariat, you can insert a "promising religion" just like the ideal communism in Russia. Here, eternal life. Mutadis mutandis, the lack of funds sacked Rome, because solders were PAID in silver + salt (hence "salary")! No money = no defence! That's how Atilla and later the Visigots sacked Rome. Romans knew that the sack of Rome was christian's fault, hence St Augustine (a paid barrister in fact) had a hard time to counter that in "The City of God"..
As funny fact: just check the full title: “On the city of God against the pagans”/Augustine 430 versus: " The Open Society and Its Enemies"/Popper 1945. Both were sophists and barristers of some propaganda. The “class enemy" shall be, and so, punished! Straight in the title.
Whereas Rome sacked in demagogy (democrats) the leaders of christian pyramid gained, by usury, discipline and fanatism. It cannot be otherwise. Beside the known Mattew Effect (25:29) is the Ananias Effect (Acts 5): if you don't give all money to "consortium" God strikes you with a thunderbolt. Just like in the bolshevik Russia. (hence Stalin made the flag with Rev 14 simbolic). The key to big-banking is the consortium -put al money together. Just as today.
An unexpected account on howto christian leaders made a fortune from christian masses is the Peregrinus novel by Lucian of Samosata cca 150 AD! He describes this jewish sect at 150 AD and the wealth gained by the leaders. A similar chibutz-sect is descibed by Joseph Flavius, a jewish-roman. Another hint was the huge sum paid for "burnng books": 50000 denarii (Acts 19:19) whereas Jesus "costed 30" (a tiny country-house). Anania, Joseph-Arimatreea, Gamaliel- teacher of Saul, etc, were super-rich. Like Lenin having 10 Rolls-Royces. Yet those "profets + bishops" obeyed the same Ananias-Law, just as today bankers. The purpose of the money was not personal wealth but the POLITICAL FINAL CONQUEST. See pharisean law > "don't swear on temple-gold! "
That's how the hidden christian banking consortium gained roman politics! Enter Galerius and Constantine: both mixed dacians+ romans, "self-made" mens - by military hierarchy. Especially Constantine had 2 reasons to accept the wealthy christians. 1. To regain the stolen gold (by Trajan) and 2. because dacians + thracians had a sort of monotheism referred by Herodot twice: Orphism and Zamolxanism. Orphic mysteries with Dyonisos; very similar to Dion-Isus - in some scenes dubiously identical! Those are chtonic = underearth mysteries in Greece (similar to Shamballa in India). Zamolxianism was set by a former scholar of Pythagora (ref. see Herodot) hence deep masonic secrets.
But the most important: Constantine had to stabilise the Empire finances and so, the gold from high-ranking christians was targeted. Probably a "gentlemens agreement + lobby" was set. As the silver Denarius was debassed/garbage, Constantine issued SOLIDUS, a gold-coin from the regained gold of christians. Gold can't be forged by chemistry. Thus, Solidus lasted until the Templars conquest 1204 and later!
The deal implied that clerigy couldn't do usury anymore; in turn they went "officals". Victory! Nicaea! A clear sign they did usury BEFORE! That was set at Nicaea, and following, Christians embraced Aristotle view on usury + universe. Old teachings - not anymore necessary, as by bolshewiks in Russia.
Corollary Rome was sacked by Visigots, wandering from Dacia at the suggestion of Constantine nephew! :) Get the "concurrence" down + get rid of Visigots from neighborhood! A severe censorship and police followed in Theodosius times. Between year 500-850 all manuscripts in Vatican and Constantinople were REPLACED with copies, and this fact is clear mentioned as Justinian + Theodosian Imperial Laws ! Orwell's "Memory-Hole". Monks rewrote everything.
Constantine was a clever politician. He cuttoff the "masonic-gnostic" teaching inside DOGMA, replaced all gnostics. But the Gospels with hidden finance-advices remained.. Further Theodosius made a severe police against gnostics. Yet the "conspiracy" fled outside the Empire just like cochroaches when you spray insecticide. You remain with the poison, and they come-back after a while..
Usury + conspiracy fled abroads: in Persia (where Theodosius expelled gnostics) or Venice, coupled later with Templars finance: Swiss + Crown Corp! The re-launch of western! In turn Venice gave the money for the crussade made to sack Constantinople, 1204. Payback.
And that's how the Roman Empire ended and the old religions have been replaced.